Inteligencia artificial y metodologías ágiles para mejorar la planificación educativa

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63688/7n5f6z37

Palabras clave:

inteligencia artificial, metodologías ágiles, planificación educativa, formación docente, desafíos éticos

Resumen

Artificial intelligence and agile methodologies constitute relevant resources for improving educational planning through activity design, learning personalization, continuous feedback, and the progressive adjustment of teaching strategies. This study aimed to analyze their contribution to educational planning. An integrative literature review was conducted through a systematic search process based on the identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion stages of PRISMA 2020. Fifteen studies published between 2020 and 2026 were included, comprising empirical research, systematic reviews, conceptual articles, institutional reports, and competency frameworks. The findings were organized into four thematic categories: artificial intelligence-assisted educational planning; agile methodologies and continuous improvement; personalization, feedback, assessment, and decision-making; and teacher training, pedagogical mediation, and ethical challenges. The results showed that artificial intelligence can support the formulation of objectives, the generation of activities, the selection of resources, and the design of assessments, while Scrum and eduScrum promote collaborative work, short planning cycles, and progress monitoring. Their effectiveness depends on clear pedagogical objectives, teacher supervision, technological reliability, digital competencies, and ethical use. Risks related to privacy, algorithmic bias, unequal access, inaccurate content, and technological dependence were also identified. It is concluded that both approaches can strengthen educational planning when they are integrated as complementary tools that support professional teacher judgment.

Referencias

Álvarez-Chaves, A., Saborío-Taylor, S., & Rojas Ramírez, F. (2025). La planificación metodológica: La inteligencia artificial como pareja pedagógica en contextos educativos universitarios. Márgenes, Revista de Educación de la Universidad de Málaga, 6(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.24310/mar.5.2.2024.19659

Bautista-López, R. (2025). Inteligencia artificial en la planeación didáctica: Una nueva herramienta para los docentes. Revista Mexicana de Investigación e Intervención Educativa, 4(3), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.62697/rmiie.v4i3.235

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.

Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, Article 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002

Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118

Chueh, H.-E., & Kao, C.-Y. (2024). Exploring the impact of integrating problem-based learning and agile in the classroom on enhancing professional competence. Heliyon, 10(3), Article e24887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24887

Hwang, G.-J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, Article 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001

Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-competency-framework-teachers

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research

Neumann, M., & Baumann, L. (2021). Agile methods in higher education: Adapting and using eduScrum with real world projects. In 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637344

OECD. (2023). OECD digital education outlook 2023: Towards an effective digital education ecosystem. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., . . . Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Saimon, M., Mtenzi, F., Lavicza, Z., Fenyvesi, K., Arnold, M., & Diego-Mantecón, J. M. (2024). Applying the 6E learning by design model to support student teachers to integrate artificial intelligence applications in their classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 23937–23954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12795-9

Tan, S. C., Lee, A. V. Y., & Lee, M. (2022). A systematic review of artificial intelligence techniques for collaborative learning over the past two decades. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100097

Vogelzang, J., Admiraal, W. F., & Van Driel, J. H. (2021). Scrum methodology in context-based secondary chemistry classes: Effects on students’ achievement and on students’ perceptions of affective and metacognitive dimensions of their learning. Instructional Science, 49(5), 719–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09554-5

Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, Article 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167

Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x

Zahorodko, P. V., & Semerikov, S. O. (2026). Integrating agile methodologies and AI-assisted learning in web programming education: A theoretical framework for CS curriculum transformation. Discover Education, 5, Article 166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01179-5

Descargas

Publicado

2026-08-04

Cómo citar

Caiza Yungan, M. P., Pilco Barahona, G. J., Reinoso Torres, C. S., Córdova Ruiz, A. D., & López Salcan, A. O. (2026). Inteligencia artificial y metodologías ágiles para mejorar la planificación educativa. Sage Sphere of Technology, Sciences, Discoveries And Society, 4(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.63688/7n5f6z37