Mathematical thinking and decision making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63688/c7cv7205Keywords:
mathematical thinking, decision-making, problem-solving, education, systematic reviewAbstract
This study analyzes the relationship between mathematical thinking and decision-making in the educational context, based on a systematic review of the scientific literature published between 2015 and 2025. The research was developed under a qualitative approach and followed the guidelines of the PRISMA 2020 model for the identification, selection, evaluation and synthesis of the included studies. Academic databases such as Scielo, Redalyc, Dialnet, Google Scholar and ScienceDirect were consulted, initially obtaining 85 investigations, of which 7 articles that met the established inclusion criteria were selected. The results show that mathematical thinking transcends the domain of numerical operations, by strengthening cognitive skills such as logical reasoning, argumentation, problem solving, information analysis and the evaluation of alternatives. Likewise, it was identified that these capacities contribute to the development of more reflective, critical and informed decisions in different academic and social contexts. The review also allowed us to recognize that the relationship between mathematical thinking and decision-making depends on the pedagogical approach applied, especially on the use of contextualized problems and strategies oriented to analysis and reflection. It is concluded that mathematical thinking is an essential training tool to promote autonomous, critical students capable of acting based on evidence, strengthening not only academic learning, but also responsible participation in society.
References
De Guzmán, M. (2006). Para pensar mejor: Desarrollo de la creatividad a través de los procesos matemáticos. Ediciones Pirámide.
Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. Free Press.
https://books.google.com/books?id=YgRHAAAAMAAJ
Kahneman, D. (2012). Pensar rápido, pensar despacio. Debate.
https://books.google.com/books/about/Pensar_r%C3%A1pido_pensar_despacio.html?id=Ypj75lf86zsC
Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (2010). Thinking mathematically (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9780273728924_A24657715/preview-9780273728924_A24657715.pdf
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. NCTM.
https://pubs.nctm.org/downloadpdf/display/book/9780873539043/front-1.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). PISA 2022 mathematics framework. OECD.
https://pisa2022-maths.oecd.org/ca/index.html
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pólya, G. (1965). Cómo plantear y resolver problemas. Trillas.
https://books.google.com/books/about/C%C3%B3mo_plantear_y_resolver_problemas.html?id=4TJYAAAACAAJ
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Academic Press.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780126288704/mathematical-problem-solving
Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (4th ed.). Free Press.
https://books.google.com/books?id=jmzWLn8pBKUC
Simon, H. A. (2021). El comportamiento administrativo: Un estudio de los procesos de decisión en las organizaciones administrativas. Errepar.
https://books.google.com/books/about/El_comportamiento_administrativo.html?id=sIkxEAAAQBAJ
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rafael Alexander Flores Pérez, Beatriz Estefanía Pérez Peñafiel, Alex Gustavo Navarrete Benavides, Wilmer Javier Labre Tarco, Stalin Ariel Galarza Poaquiza (Autor/a)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
