Mathematical thinking and decision making

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63688/c7cv7205

Keywords:

mathematical thinking, decision-making, problem-solving, education, systematic review

Abstract

This study analyzes the relationship between mathematical thinking and decision-making in the educational context, based on a systematic review of the scientific literature published between 2015 and 2025. The research was developed under a qualitative approach and followed the guidelines of the PRISMA 2020 model for the identification, selection, evaluation and synthesis of the included studies. Academic databases such as Scielo, Redalyc, Dialnet, Google Scholar and ScienceDirect were consulted, initially obtaining 85 investigations, of which 7 articles that met the established inclusion criteria were selected. The results show that mathematical thinking transcends the domain of numerical operations, by strengthening cognitive skills such as logical reasoning, argumentation, problem solving, information analysis and the evaluation of alternatives. Likewise, it was identified that these capacities contribute to the development of more reflective, critical and informed decisions in different academic and social contexts. The review also allowed us to recognize that the relationship between mathematical thinking and decision-making depends on the pedagogical approach applied, especially on the use of contextualized problems and strategies oriented to analysis and reflection. It is concluded that mathematical thinking is an essential training tool to promote autonomous, critical students capable of acting based on evidence, strengthening not only academic learning, but also responsible participation in society.

References

De Guzmán, M. (2006). Para pensar mejor: Desarrollo de la creatividad a través de los procesos matemáticos. Ediciones Pirámide.

https://edicionespiramide.es/libro/ciencia-hoy/para-pensar-mejor-miguel-de-guzman-ozamiz-9788436841794/

Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. Free Press.

https://books.google.com/books?id=YgRHAAAAMAAJ

Kahneman, D. (2012). Pensar rápido, pensar despacio. Debate.

https://books.google.com/books/about/Pensar_r%C3%A1pido_pensar_despacio.html?id=Ypj75lf86zsC

Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (2010). Thinking mathematically (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.

https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9780273728924_A24657715/preview-9780273728924_A24657715.pdf

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. NCTM.

https://pubs.nctm.org/downloadpdf/display/book/9780873539043/front-1.pdf

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). PISA 2022 mathematics framework. OECD.

https://pisa2022-maths.oecd.org/ca/index.html

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pólya, G. (1965). Cómo plantear y resolver problemas. Trillas.

https://books.google.com/books/about/C%C3%B3mo_plantear_y_resolver_problemas.html?id=4TJYAAAACAAJ

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Academic Press.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780126288704/mathematical-problem-solving

Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (4th ed.). Free Press.

https://books.google.com/books?id=jmzWLn8pBKUC

Simon, H. A. (2021). El comportamiento administrativo: Un estudio de los procesos de decisión en las organizaciones administrativas. Errepar.

https://books.google.com/books/about/El_comportamiento_administrativo.html?id=sIkxEAAAQBAJ

Published

2026-05-09

How to Cite

Flores Pérez, R. A., Pérez Peñafiel, B. E., Navarrete Benavides, A. G., Labre Tarco, W. J., & Galarza Poaquiza, S. A. (2026). Mathematical thinking and decision making. Sage Sphere of Technology, Sciences, Discoveries And Society, 4(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.63688/c7cv7205