Security, trade, and data capital: private corporations in us Canada border surveillance architecture

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63688/7hktej03

Keywords:

Dataveillance, Security, Trade, Data Capital, Border Governance

Abstract

This article examines how security, trade, and data capital intersect in shaping the contemporary U.S.–Canada border, with particular attention to the increasingly prominent role of private corporations in digital surveillance systems. Drawing on a qualitative and critical approach, the study analyzes public policy documents, corporate reports, and regional initiatives, supported by a theoretical framework that engages concepts such as governmentality and biopolitics. The findings show that corporations are not merely technology providers, but also active participants in the design and expansion of surveillance infrastructures, where tools such as biometrics, data-sharing platforms, and algorithmic monitoring are justified through discourses of efficiency, security, and economic competitiveness. In this context, the border is reconfigured as a space increasingly driven by data, one that facilitates trade while simultaneously intensifying mechanisms of control and classification of mobility. Consequently, the article argues that this convergence of interests reflects a broader shift toward more privatized and data-centered forms of governance, raising important questions about accountability, transparency, and the protection of rights in an increasingly digitized border environment.

References

Amoore, L. (2006). Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror. Political Geography, 25(3), 336–351. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0962629806000217?via%3Dihub

Andreas, P. (2003). Redrawing the line: Borders and security in the twenty-first century. International Security, 28(2), 78–111. https://direct.mit.edu/isec/article-abstract/28/2/78/11776/Redrawing-the-Line-Borders-and-Security-in-the?redirectedFrom=fulltext

Andrejevic, M. (2014). The big data divide. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1673–1689. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2161/1163

Aas, K. F. (2006). “The body does not lie”: Identity, risk and trust in technoculture. Crime, Media, Culture, 2(2), 143–158. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1741659006065401

Aradau, C., & Blanke, T. (2017). Politics of prediction: Security and the time/space of governmentality in the age of big data. European Journal of Social Theory, 20(3), 373–391. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1368431016667623

Ajana, B. (2015). Digital health and the biopolitics of the quantified self. Digital Health, 1, 1–18. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2055207616689509

Allen, W. L., & Vollmer, B. A. (2018). Clean skins: Making the e-Border security assemblage. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 36(1), 23–39. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0263775817722565

Bigo, D. (2006). Globalized (in)security: The field and the ban-opticon. En D. Bigo & A. Tsoukala (Eds.), Terror, insecurity and liberty (pp. 10–48). Routledge. https://anyflip.com/qiho/dfqh/basic

Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.https://www.academia.edu/39047709/Buzan_Waever_and_De_Wilde_1998_Security_A_New_Framework_For_Analysis

Clarke, R. (1988). Information technology and dataveillance. Communications of the ACM, 31(5), 498–512. https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/42411.42413

Côté-Boucher, K. (2013). The paradox of discretion: Customs and the changing occupational identity of Canadian border officers. British Journal of Criminology, 53(2), 317–335. https://eriqa.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/azv023.pdf

Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978. Palgrave Macmillan. https://mirror.explodie.org/Foucault-Security-Territory-Population.pdf

Hall, A. (2017). Decisions at the data border: Discretion, discernment and security. Security Dialogue, 48(6), 488–504. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/125417/1/Decisions_at_the_data_border.pdf

Lyon, D. (2018). The culture of surveillance: Watching as a way of life. Polity Press. https://fliphtml5.com/znrxj/mwhv/The_Culture_of_Surveillance_Watching_as_a_Way_of_Life/

Molnar, P. (2019). Technological testing grounds: Migration management experiments and reflections from the ground up. https://edri.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Technological-Testing-Grounds.pdf

Walters, W. (2006). Border/control. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(2), 187–203. https://eclass.uoa.gr/modules/document/file.php/PHS498/7.3%20Border%20control%20walters.pdf

Published

2026-05-09

How to Cite

María de los Angeles, B. S. (2026). Security, trade, and data capital: private corporations in us Canada border surveillance architecture. Journal of Multidisciplinary Novel Journeys & Explorations, 4(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.63688/7hktej03