El uso de inteligencia artificial en la enseñanza de la escritura: oportunidades y riesgos para el desarrollo de competencias lingüísticas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63688/1ykksk02Palabras clave:
inteligencia artificial, enseñanza de la escritura, competencias lingüísticas, inteligencia artificial generativa, retroalimentación automatizada, educaciónResumen
La inteligencia artificial (IA) se ha convertido en una herramienta emergente dentro del ámbito educativo debido a su capacidad para transformar los procesos de enseñanza y aprendizaje, particularmente en el desarrollo de habilidades relacionadas con la escritura. El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar el uso de la inteligencia artificial en la enseñanza de la escritura, identificando sus oportunidades, aportes y riesgos en el fortalecimiento de las competencias lingüísticas. Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura científica siguiendo las directrices PRISMA 2020, mediante la búsqueda, selección y análisis de estudios publicados entre 2019 y 2026 en bases de datos académicas como Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, ERIC, IEEE Xplore, SciELO y Google Scholar. La revisión incluyó 23 investigaciones relacionadas con inteligencia artificial generativa, modelos de lenguaje, retroalimentación automatizada, personalización del aprendizaje y desafíos éticos asociados al uso de estas tecnologías. Los resultados evidencian que la IA puede favorecer la producción textual mediante la generación de ideas, corrección lingüística, revisión de contenidos y retroalimentación personalizada, contribuyendo al desarrollo de competencias comunicativas y procesos de escritura más reflexivos. Sin embargo, también se identificaron desafíos vinculados con la dependencia tecnológica, pérdida de autoría, integridad académica y necesidad de fortalecer las competencias digitales de estudiantes y docentes. Se concluye que la inteligencia artificial representa un recurso complementario con alto potencial educativo, siempre que su implementación se desarrolle bajo criterios pedagógicos, éticos y críticos que permitan potenciar las capacidades humanas sin sustituir los procesos cognitivos propios de la escritura.
Referencias
Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K–12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2, 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7
Aromataris, E., & Munn, Z. (Eds.). (2020). JBI manual for evidence synthesis. Joanna Briggs Institute. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-01
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., Brynjolfsson, E., Buch, S., Card, D., Castellon, R., Chatterji, N., Chen, A., Creel, K., Davis, J. Q., Demszky, D., . . . Liang, P. (2021). On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. Stanford Center for Research on Foundation Models. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.07258
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Bozkurt, A., Karadeniz, A., Baneres, D., Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., & Rodríguez, M. E. (2021). Artificial intelligence and reflections from educational landscape: A review of AI studies in half a century. Sustainability, 13(2), Article 800. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020800
Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating? Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Cukurova, M., Miao, X., & Brooker, R. (2023). Adoption of artificial intelligence in schools: Unveiling factors influencing teachers’ engagement. In Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 151–163). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36272-9_13
Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 277–303. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821125
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Jeon, J., & Lee, S. (2023). Large language models in education: A focus on the complementary relationship between human teachers and ChatGPT. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11834-1
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., . . . Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339, b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B.-P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 4221–4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., . . . Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Ranalli, J. (2019). Automated written corrective feedback: How does it work? Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.03.001
Redecker, C. (2019). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Regan, P. M., & Jesse, J. (2019). Ethical challenges of edtech, big data and personalized learning: Twenty-first century student sorting and tracking. Ethics and Information Technology, 21, 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9492-2
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., & Huang, R. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
UNESCO. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO.
Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Yu, H., & Guo, Y. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence empowers educational reform: Current status, issues, and prospects. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1183162. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1183162
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., Liu, J.-B., Yuan, J., & Li, Y. (2021). A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity, 2021, 8812542. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542
Zirar, A., Ali, S. I., & Islam, N. (2023). Exploring the impact of language models, such as ChatGPT, on student learning and assessment. Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3433
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Jessica Adriana Calle Guallpa, Lucía Mercedes Morán Delgado, Andrea Katerine Carabalí Méndez, María Elisa Delgado Holguín, Isabel Margoth Tipán Camino (Autor/a)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
