The Analysis of Current Social Problems as a Pedagogical Resource to Strengthen Critical Thinking and Citizenship Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63688/6e35za11Keywords:
critical thinking, social problems, citizenship education, service-learning, digital literacyAbstract
The analysis of current social problems is a relevant pedagogical resource for connecting school learning with students’ reality and strengthening critical thinking and citizenship education. This study aimed to analyze, based on recent scientific literature, how addressing social issues can promote argumentation, participation, social justice, and contextualized learning. The research was conducted through a systematic literature review with a qualitative documentary approach and descriptive quantitative support, following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A total of 15 scientific articles published between 2021 and 2024 were analyzed, focusing on critical thinking, active citizenship, problem-based learning, controversial issues, digital media literacy, and service-learning. The findings show that working with real social problems encourages information analysis, reasoned dialogue, ethical reflection, and informed participation. It is concluded that this pedagogical strategy contributes to the development of more critical, participatory students who are committed to transforming their environment.
References
Albanesi, C., & Compare, C. (2023). Integrating academic learning: Promoting civic engagement, responsibility, and social justice through service-learning. Form@re - Open Journal per la Formazione in Rete, 23(2), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.36253/form-14684
Alhowail, A. M., & Albaqami, S. E. (2024). Evaluation of the critical thinking skills of secondary school students in Saudi Arabia. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 82(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.07
Alscher, P., Ludewig, U., & McElvany, N. (2022). Civic education, teaching quality and students’ willingness to participate in political and civic life: Political interest and knowledge as mediators. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51, 1886–1900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01639-9
Anggraeni, D. M., Prahani, B. K., Suprapto, N., Shofiyah, N., & Jatmiko, B. (2023). Systematic review of problem based learning research in fostering critical thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, Article 101334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101334
Aston, K. J. (2024). “Why is this hard, to have critical thinking?” Exploring the factors affecting critical thinking with international higher education students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 25(3), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874231168341
Body, A., Lau, E., Cunliffe, J., & Cameron, L. (2024). Mapping active civic learning in primary schools across England—A call to action. British Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 1308–1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3975
Bourn, D., & Soysal, N. (2021). Transformative learning and pedagogical approaches in education for sustainable development: Are initial teacher education programmes in England and Turkey ready for creating agents of change for sustainability? Sustainability, 13(16), Article 8973. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168973
González-Valencia, G., Massip Sabater, M., & Santisteban Fernández, A. (2022). Critical global citizenship education: A study on secondary school students. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 867113. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.867113
Martini, M., Rollero, C., Rizzo, M., Di Carlo, S., De Piccoli, N., & Fedi, A. (2023). Educating youth to civic engagement for social justice: Evaluation of a secondary school project. Behavioral Sciences, 13(8), Article 650. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13080650
Mrah, I. (2022). Digital media literacy in the age of mis/disinformation: The case of Moroccan university students. Digital Education Review, 41, 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2022.41.176-194
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Santamaría-Cárdaba, N., Gajardo-Espinoza, K., & Cáceres-Iglesias, J. (2024). Global citizenship education: A systematic review of educational research. Educational Process: International Journal, 13(4), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2024.134.7
Sætra, E. (2021). Discussing controversial issues in the classroom: Elements of good practice. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(2), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1705897
Waghid, Z. (2024). Cultivating critical thinking, social justice awareness and empathy among pre-service teachers through online discussions on global citizenship education. Journal of Creative Communications, 19(1), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/09732586231194438
Wansink, B. G. J., Mol, H., Kortekaas, J., & Mainhard, T. (2023a). Discussing controversial issues in the classroom: Exploring students’ safety perceptions and their willingness to participate. Teaching and Teacher Education, 125, Article 104044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104044
Wansink, B. G. J., Timmer, J., & Bronkhorst, L. H. (2023b). Navigating multiple perspectives in discussing controversial topics: Boundary crossing in the classroom. Education Sciences, 13(9), Article 938. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090938
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mayra Valeria Lojano Quilambaqui, Paula Beatriz Castro Guzmán, Sonia Mariela Carpio Alemán, Juan Carlos Arévalo Torres, Ludis Judith Ordóñez Chimbo (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
