Visual Mathematics and 21st century learning: a systematic review of educational innovation and digital tools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63688/jrq1c284Keywords:
visual mathematics, meaningful learning, educational innovation, digital tools, artificial intelligenceAbstract
Mathematics education faces the challenge of incorporating innovative strategies that move beyond traditional models based on memorization and promote deeper learning processes. In this context, visual mathematics represents an educational alternative that integrates graphic representations, digital resources, visual narratives, and artificial intelligence to strengthen meaningful learning in the 21st century.
A systematic literature review was conducted using a qualitative approach and descriptive scope, following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Scientific publications from 2022 to 2026 were analyzed from academic databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, ERIC, and Google Scholar. After the identification, screening, and eligibility processes, 19 studies were selected for documentary analysis.
The findings showed that strategies based on mathematical visualization, digital tools, artificial intelligence, interactive models, and audiovisual narratives enhance conceptual understanding, spatial thinking, creativity, and problem-solving skills. Additionally, the integration of technology requires pedagogical support and teachers’ digital competencies.
Visual mathematics represents an innovative strategy for transforming mathematics learning through more dynamic, accessible, and meaningful experiences. The integration of digital and visual resources provides opportunities to design educational environments aligned with the demands of the 21st century.
References
Arcavi, A. (2023). The role of visual representations in mathematics learning and reasoning. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 55, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01489-5
Bell, S. (2022). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 95(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2022.2031527
Boaler, J., & Dweck, C. (2022). Mathematical mindsets and creative mathematical learning in contemporary education. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2056916
Bowen, G. A. (2023). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 23(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-01-2023-0005
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2022). What works and doesn’t work with instructional explanations: A meta-analysis of multimedia learning principles. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09635-8
Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel: A synthesis of over 2,100 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kong, S. C., & Abelson, H. (2023). Computational thinking education and digital transformation: Emerging trends and challenges. Computers & Education, 197, 104731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104731
Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., Di Martino, P., & Robutti, O. (2023). Research on mathematics education: Innovations, challenges and future directions. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 55, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01474-y
Luckin, R. (2024). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers and educators. Routledge.
Mayer, R. E. (2022). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333
Newcombe, N. S. (2023). Spatial thinking in education: The importance of visual representations and spatial reasoning. Educational Psychology Review, 35, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09752-8
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). OECD Learning Compass 2030: A series of concept notes. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … McKenzie, J. E. (2022). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
Redecker, C. (2022). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Robin, B. R. (2022). The power of digital storytelling to support teaching and learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10054-4
Snyder, H. (2023). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 156, 113484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113484
Torraco, R. J. (2022). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 21(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843221105014
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/technology
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Pareja Roblin, N. (2022). Technological pedagogical content knowledge in digital learning environments: New perspectives for education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70, 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10034-8
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2022). Understanding by design framework for improving student learning. ASCD.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2023). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00389-5
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Darwin Fabricio Rivadeneira Gallardo, Javier Ismael Cevallos Culqui, Lorena Rivadeneira Gallardo, José Andrés Cifuentes Flores, Alexandra Guadalupe Ponce Gutiérrez (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
