Ethics and artificial intelligence in university degree completion processes: a systematic review of risks and institutional strategies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63688/7yyexg97

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, academic ethics, university degree completion, academic integrity, higher education

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence use in university degree completion processes poses challenges for authorship, integrity, and learning assessment. This review aimed to synthesize relevant ethical risks and institutional strategies, distinguishing direct evidence from findings transferable from other university contexts. Methodology: A systematic review with thematic synthesis was conducted and reported following PRISMA 2020. Searches in Scopus, SciELO, and Redalyc, performed on 15–17 September 2026, covered publications from 2023 onward. Of 65 retrieved records, 35 publications were included. Results: Findings were organized around authorship and transparency, reliability, privacy, equity, supervision, and governance. Bibliographic errors, attribution difficulties, and limitations of automated detectors were identified. Strategies included disclosing assistance, verifying sources, protecting data, and supporting the research process. Heterogeneous designs and the indirect relevance of part of the evidence limit transferability to degree completion processes. Conclusions: The findings support components of a future institutional protocol, whose implementation requires disciplinary adaptation and evaluation of its effects on learning, integrity, and equity.

References

Alduais, A., Qadhi, S., Chaaban, Y., & Khraisheh, M. (2025). The ETHICAL protocol for responsible use of generative AI for research purposes in higher education. AI Magazine, 46(4), e70047. https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.70047

Balalle, H., & Pannilage, S. (2025). Reassessing academic integrity in the age of AI: A systematic literature review on AI and academic integrity. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101299

Bhullar, P. S., Joshi, M., & Chugh, R. (2024). ChatGPT in higher education: A synthesis of the literature and a future research agenda. Education and Information Technologies, 29(16), 21501–21522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12723-x

Bittle, K., & El-Gayar, O. (2025). Generative AI and academic integrity in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Information, 16(4), 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040296

Breceda Pérez, J. A. (2025). Hacia la regulación ética del uso de inteligencia artificial en la investigación científica, lineamientos desde la Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez. Revista de Bioética y Derecho, (64), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1344/rbd2025.64.48719

Camacho Vázquez, M. R., Pérez Méndez, J., Cárdenas Castellanos, J., & Adaile Benítez, N. T. (2025). Implicaciones éticas del uso de inteligencia artificial en educación superior. Emerging Trends in Education, 8(15), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.19136/etie.v8n15.6343

Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3

Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

Cordero Monzón, M. A. (2025). Gestión ética y seguridad en el uso de inteligencia artificial por estudiantes universitarios. RIDE Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 16(31), e968. https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v16i31.2623

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Foltynek, T., Bjelobaba, S., Glendinning, I., Khan, Z. R., Santos, R., Pavletic, P., & Kravjar, J. (2023). ENAI recommendations on the ethical use of artificial intelligence in education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00133-4

Gallent-Torres, C., Zapata-González, A., & Ortego-Hernando, J. L. (2023). El impacto de la inteligencia artificial generativa en educación superior: Una mirada desde la ética y la integridad académica. RELIEVE. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 29(2), M5. https://doi.org/10.30827/relieve.v29i2.29134

González Fernández, M. O., Romero-López, M. A., Sgreccia, N. F., & Latorre Medina, M. J. (2025). Marcos normativos para una IA ética y confiable en la educación superior: Estado de la cuestión. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 28(2), 181–208. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.28.2.43511

Héctor Ardisana, E. F., & Millet Gaínza, B. (2025). Inteligencia artificial (ChatGPT) en la educación universitaria: Realidad y consideraciones éticas. Chakiñan, Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, (25), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.37135/chk.002.25.13

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., ... Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Liang, W., Yuksekgonul, M., Mao, Y., Wu, E., & Zou, J. (2023). GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers. Patterns, 4(7), 100779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100779

Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410

López-Vasco, F. E., Angulo-Álvarez, M. R., & Sosa-Zúñiga, D. I. (2025). Formación docente en IA generativa: Impacto ético y retos en educación superior. Alteridad, 20(2), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.17163/alt.v20n2.2025.01

Moorhouse, B. L., Yeo, M. A., & Wan, Y. (2023). Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world's top-ranking universities. Computers and Education Open, 5, 100151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151

Moya, B. A., & Eaton, S. E. (2023). Examinando recomendaciones para el uso de la inteligencia artificial generativa con integridad desde una lente de enseñanza y aprendizaje. RELIEVE. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 29(2), M1. https://doi.org/10.30827/relieve.v29i2.29295

Navarro-Dolmestch, R. (2023). Descripción de los riesgos y desafíos para la integridad académica de aplicaciones generativas de inteligencia artificial. Derecho PUCP, (91), 231–270. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202302.007

Ojeda, A. D., Solano-Barliza, A. D., Ortega Alvarez, D., & Boom Cárcamo, E. (2023). Análisis del impacto de la inteligencia artificial ChatGPT en los procesos de enseñanza y aprendizaje en la educación universitaria. Formación Universitaria, 16(6), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50062023000600061

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Perkins, M. (2023). Academic integrity considerations of AI large language models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07

Perkins, M., Furze, L., Roe, J., & MacVaugh, J. (2024). The artificial intelligence assessment scale (AIAS): A framework for ethical integration of generative AI in educational assessment. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(6). https://doi.org/10.53761/q3azde36

Puche Villalobos, D. J. (2025). La inteligencia artificial y el fraude académico en el contexto universitario. Revista Digital de Investigación y Postgrado, 6(11), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.59654/kg944e15

Rodríguez, G. A., Chiappe, A., & Durand, J. (2026). Artificial intelligence in doctoral training: Bridging gaps, easing burdens. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102744

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 342–363. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9

Sánchez Macías, A., Zilberstein Toruncha, J., Flores Rueda, I. C., & Peñalosa Otero, M. E. (2025). Percepción de las implicaciones éticas en el uso de la inteligencia artificial (IA). Emerging Trends in Education, 8(15), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.19136/etie.v8n15.6336

Sánchez-Bolívar, L., Escalante-González, S., & Martínez-Martínez, A. (2024). La ética de la inteligencia artificial en educación: ¿Amenaza u oportunidad? Revista Electrónica Educare, 28(S), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.28-S.20541

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

Torres Morales, J. G., Fernández Cortes, O., & Ramírez Ortiz, M. V. (2025). Prospectiva y futuro: Políticas públicas y marco regulatorio para garantizar el uso ético y responsable de la IA en la educación superior. Inter disciplina, 13(37), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.22201/ceiich.24485705e.2025.37.92511

Vásquez Cardona, F., Carmona García, V., & Pérez Valencia, D. (2025). ChatGPT en la educación superior: Un estudio transversal sobre su uso, percepciones éticas e impacto en la integridad académica. Revista de Bioética y Derecho, (65), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1344/rbd2025.65.49416

Walters, W. H., & Wilder, E. I. (2023). Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 14045. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41032-5

Wang, H., Dang, A., Wu, Z., & Mac, S. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: Seeing ChatGPT through universities' policies, resources, and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100326

Weber-Wulff, D., Anohina-Naumeca, A., Bjelobaba, S., Foltýnek, T., Guerrero-Dib, J., Popoola, O., Šigut, P., & Waddington, L. (2023). Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z

Published

2026-10-30

How to Cite

Mora Gutiérrez, H. E., Guerrero Valarezo, S. L., Guerrero Valarezo, F. E., & Rodríguez Ycaza, S. G. (2026). Ethics and artificial intelligence in university degree completion processes: a systematic review of risks and institutional strategies. Sage Sphere of Technology, Sciences, Discoveries And Society, 4(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.63688/7yyexg97